| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 7:57 am    Post subject: A good Menneske | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				This one went on for a while ...
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  Puzzle: M6852107sh(14)
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . . . | . . . | 2 . 7 | 
 
| . 4 2 | . . 5 | . 1 8 | 
 
| 1 . . | 9 . . | . . . | 
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| 4 . . | . 2 9 | . . 6 | 
 
| . 5 . | 1 . 8 | . 3 . | 
 
| . . . | 7 5 . | . . . | 
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| 6 . . | . . 1 | . . 4 | 
 
| . 2 . | 8 . . | 6 5 . | 
 
| 8 3 . | . . . | . . . | 
 
+-------+-------+-------+ | 	  Not for the faint of heart!  Here is what Sudoku Susser says: 	  | Quote: | 	 		  3 x Simple Forcing Chains
 
  4 x Simple Forcing Loops
 
  2 x XY-Wing
 
  1 x Swordfish
 
  1 x Comprehensive Naked Sets
 
  1 x Intersection Removal
 
  11 x Pinned Squares
 
 | 	  Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		cgordon
 
 
  Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 769 Location: ontario, canada
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:30 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I gave up on this one - well actually I didn't.  I know this is guessing - but it is "logical" guessing. I looked for a strong link where a 50:50 guess would do the most damage by getting rid of a number with the most clutter. In this case I placed the <7> in R9C8.  The thing fell apart after that - nothing but singles!! | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:43 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | cgordon wrote: | 	 		  | I gave up on this one - well actually I didn't.  I know this is guessing - but it is "logical" guessing. I looked for a strong link where a 50:50 guess would do the most damage by getting rid of a number with the most clutter. In this case I placed the <7> in R9C8.  The thing fell apart after that - nothing but singles!! | 	  
 
That would be an Alternating Implication Cell?     
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:47 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				After basics: 	  | Code: | 	 		  +----------------+----------------+----------------+
 
| 5    689  689  | 4    1    3    | 2    69   7    | 
 
| 39   4    2    | 6    7    5    | 39   1    8    | 
 
| 1    67   367  | 9    8    2    | 34   46   5    | 
 
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
 
| 4    1    78   | 3    2    9    | 5    78   6    | 
 
| 279  5    679  | 1    46   8    | 479  3    29   | 
 
| 239  689  3689 | 7    5    46   | 1489 2489 129  | 
 
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
 
| 6    79   5    | 2    3    1    | 789  789  4    | 
 
| 79   2    1    | 8    49   47   | 6    5    3    | 
 
| 8    3    4    | 5    69   67   | 179  279  129  | 
 
+----------------+----------------+----------------+ | 	  Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:04 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				This was stubborn. M-Wing, Hidden UR, XY-Wing with coloring, multi-coloring, XY-Wing and W-Wing, both with coloring, and still it wouldn't break.
 
 
From the get-go it was obvious that this was a Medusa candidate and I finally resorted to it. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:15 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				A tightly weaved succession of eliminations!
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		   after basics and not searching for URs
 
 +--------------------------------------------------------------+
 
 |  5     689   689   |  4     1     3     |  2     69    7     |
 
 |  39    4     2     |  6     7     5     |  39    1     8     |
 
 |  1     67    367   |  9     8     2     |  34    46    5     |
 
 |--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
 
 |  4     1     78    |  3     2     9     |  5     78    6     |
 
 |  279   5     679   |  1     46    8     |  479   3     29    |
 
 |  239   689   3689  |  7     5     46    |  1489  2489  129   |
 
 |--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
 
 |  6     79    5     |  2     3     1     |  789   789   4     |
 
 |  79    2     1     |  8     49    47    |  6     5     3     |
 
 |  8     3     4     |  5     69    67    |  179   279   129   |
 
 +--------------------------------------------------------------+
 
 # 54 eliminations remain   (47 cells solved)
 
 | 	  
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		   finned  Swordfish r289\c157 w/fins [r9c89]                 =>  [r7c7]<>9   -or-
 
 (9) r9c789 = r9c6 - r8c6 = r8c1 - r2c1 = r2c7              =>  [r7c7]<>9
 
 
 (6=7)r3c2 - (7=9)r7c2 - (9=7)r8c1 - (7=4)r8c6 - (4=6)r6c6  =>  [r6c2]<>6 [XY-Chain]
 
 
         XY-Wing  [r7c2]/[r6c2]+[r7c7]                      =>  [r6c7]<>8
 
 
         Swordfish r347\c238                                =>  [r5c3],[r9c8]<>7
 
 
 (9=6)r5c3 - (6=4)r5c5 - (4=9)r8c5 - (9=7)r8c1 - (7=9)r7c2  =>  [r6c2]<>9 [XY-Chain]
 
____________________________________________________________________________________
 
 | 	  
 
Note: This puzzle has so many backdoor singles that it's a perfect candidate for Craig's approach (above). | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		storm_norm
 
 
  Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 11:53 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				this route will take some useless w-wings and extend them like rubber... after this coloring move on 9...
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  .------------------.------------------.------------------.
 
| 5     689   689  | 4     1     3    | 2     69    7    |
 
|*39    4     2    | 6     7     5    |*39    1     8    |
 
| 1     67    367  | 9     8     2    | 34    46    5    |
 
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
 
| 4     1     78   | 3     2     9    | 5     78    6    |
 
| 279   5     679  | 1     46    8    | 479   3     29   |
 
| 239   689   3689 | 7     5     46   | 1489  2489  129  |
 
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
 
| 6    *79    5    | 2     3     1    |78-9   789   4    |
 
|*79    2     1    | 8     49    47   | 6     5     3    |
 
| 8     3     4    | 5     69    67   | 179   279   129  |
 
'------------------'------------------'------------------' | 	  
 
step1... (9)... r2c7 = r2c1 - r8c1 = r7c2; r7c7 <> 9
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  .------------------.------------------.------------------.
 
| 5     689   689  | 4     1     3    | 2    W69    7    |
 
| 39    4     2    | 6     7     5    | 39    1     8    |
 
| 1     67   *367  | 9     8     2    |*34   *46    5    |
 
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
 
| 4     1     78   | 3     2     9    | 5     78    6    |
 
| 279   5     679  | 1    *46    8    | 479   3     29   |
 
| 239   689  *3689 | 7     5    *46   | 1489  2489  129  |
 
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
 
| 6     79    5    | 2     3     1    | 78   W789   4    |
 
| 79    2     1    | 8     49    47   | 6     5     3    |
 
| 8     3     4    | 5    W69    67   |W179  W279  W129  |
 
'------------------'------------------'------------------' | 	  
 
marked the W-wing {6,9}with W's...  and then extended it on both sides...to eliminate the 6 in r6c3...
 
w-wing marked in red...
 
step2...(3)r6c3 = (3)r3c3 - (3=4)r3c7 - (4=6)r3c8 - (6=9)r1c8 - (9)r7c8 = (9)r9c789 - (9=6)r9c5 - (6)r5c5 = (6)r6c6; r6c3 <> 6
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  .------------------.------------------.------------------.
 
| 5     689   689  | 4     1     3    | 2     69    7    |
 
| 39    4     2    | 6     7     5    | 39    1     8    |
 
| 1    W67    367  | 9     8     2    | 34    46    5    |
 
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
 
| 4     1     78   | 3     2     9    | 5     78    6    |
 
| 279   5     679  | 1     46    8    | 479   3     29   |
 
| 239  W689   389  | 7     5    W46   | 1489  2489  129  |
 
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
 
| 6    -79    5    | 2     3     1    | 78    789   4    |
 
|*79    2     1    | 8     49   *47   | 6     5     3    |
 
| 8     3     4    | 5     69   W67   | 179   279   129  |
 
'------------------'------------------'------------------' | 	  
 
again, marked the W-wing {6,7} with W's and extended the 7's to eliminate the 7 in r7c2...
 
w-wing marked in red...
 
step3...(7=6)r3c2 - (6)r6c2 = (6)r6c6 - (6=7)r9c6 - (7)r8c6 = (7)r8c1; r7c2 <> 7 | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |