| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 5770
Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
 Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 12:39 am Post subject: May 15 VH |
 |
|
I feel like getting Earl mad, so I'm starting the thread before him. 
I did it twice, just to make sure of my original solution.
| Quote: | | It's a zero-stepper |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Louise56
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 94
Location: El Cajon, California USA
|
| Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I did it once but needed a step, I'll try it again to see if I can keep up with Marty  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
themarsman
Joined: 17 Jun 2007
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I was also able to solve it using no advanced techniques. Not a very hard by any measure |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swando
Joined: 09 Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Location: Surrey, BC. Canada
|
| Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't know if it was needed but I spotted an xy wing on 239 and that solved it quite easily |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
| Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, no advanced steps required. The hardest step is to notice the <39> pair, after you have noticed the easy <28> pair.
Keith
Last edited by keith on Fri May 15, 2009 9:20 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cgordon
Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 769
Location: ontario, canada
|
| Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Funny that! I used an ER on 9 which was very easy to spot and then read that no VH steps were required. So I did it again VH-less and it took me much longer. This suggests that one step VHs are easier than zero-step VHs. But then you can't have zero-step VHs. It's all so confusing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
giadich
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just curious!
Has anyone ever solved Sudoku puzzle by using just paper printout and pen? and please do not write out combo numbers on the puzzle. It looks too messy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1741
|
| Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| giadich wrote: | Just curious!
Has anyone ever solved Sudoku puzzle by using just paper printout and pen? and please do not write out combo numbers on the puzzle. It looks too messy |
I'd like to think most solvers start this way. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
giadich
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| storm_norm wrote: | | giadich wrote: | Just curious!
Has anyone ever solved Sudoku puzzle by using just paper printout and pen? and please do not write out combo numbers on the puzzle. It looks too messy |
I'd like to think most solvers start this way. |
Agree! It is a true sudoku solver. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kdelle
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 59
Location: Hudson, NH
|
| Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| giadich wrote: | Just curious!
Has anyone ever solved Sudoku puzzle by using just paper printout and pen? and please do not write out combo numbers on the puzzle. It looks too messy |
I've often thought that our different "approaches" would make for an interesting discussion. When I first found this site I was very appreciative of the "sweep" feature....but now I rarely use it because I found that I wasn't really "looking" at the puzzle, but rather looking at the"possibilies". So a unique possibility jumped right out at me. But I find I more enjoy pencil (NOT pen) and paper.
Edit: If I make a mistake, though.....It's a sweep for me! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mike S
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:12 pm Post subject: 39, 239 |
|
|
I'm having trouble spotting the <39> pair
and the <239> XY Wing. Can someone
point me in the right direction.
Thanks for your help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
| Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mike,
Basics should get you to here. This is not necessarily that easy!
| Code: | +-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 6 1 7 | 9 8 23 | 4 5 23 |
| 23589 289 258 | 4 6 7 | 1 28 2389 |
| 2389 2489 248 | 5 1 23 | 39 7 6 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 28 3 248 | 1 24 5 | 6 9 7 |
| 7 24 6 | 3 24 9 | 8 1 5 |
| 1 5 9 | 8 7 6 | 2 3 4 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 4 29 1 | 7 5 8 | 39 6 239 |
| 589 6 58 | 2 3 1 | 7 4 89 |
| 28 7 3 | 6 9 4 | 5 28 1 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
|
The <28> pair is in C1. Then, the <39> pair is in R3: | Code: | +----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 6 1 7 | 9 8 23 | 4 5 23 |
| 359 289 258 | 4 6 7 | 1 28 2389 |
| 39 2489 248 | 5 1 23 | 39 7 6 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 28 3 248 | 1 24 5 | 6 9 7 |
| 7 24 6 | 3 24 9 | 8 1 5 |
| 1 5 9 | 8 7 6 | 2 3 4 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 4 29 1 | 7 5 8 | 39 6 239 |
| 59 6 58 | 2 3 1 | 7 4 89 |
| 28 7 3 | 6 9 4 | 5 28 1 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+ |
I do not see that there is any <239> wing, if you first exhaust the singles on the way to the first grid I posted above.
Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mike S
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the info. I was pretty far along when I got stuck:
| Code: |
+------------+--------+------------+
| 6 1 7 | 9 8 23 | 4 5 23 |
| 2359 29 25 | 4 6 7 | 1 28 2389 |
| 239 8 4 | 5 1 23 | 39 7 6 |
+------------+--------+------------+
| 28 3 28 | 1 4 5 | 6 9 7 |
| 7 4 6 | 3 2 9 | 8 1 5 |
| 1 5 9 | 8 7 6 | 2 3 4 |
+------------+--------+------------+
| 4 29 1 | 7 5 8 | 39 6 239 |
| 589 6 58 | 2 3 1 | 7 4 89 |
| 28 7 3 | 6 9 4 | 5 28 1 |
+------------+--------+------------+
|
I can't believe I missed a naked pair, <28>, in column 1. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Clement
Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Posts: 1113
Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
|
| Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 4:38 am Post subject: Daily Sudoku: Fri 15-May-2009 VH |
|
|
| XY-Wing <258> with pivot <58> in r8c3 and pincers <28>r8c1 and <25> r2c3 eliminating the 2's in BOX 1 c1 solves the puzzle. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swando
Joined: 09 Mar 2009
Posts: 22
Location: Surrey, BC. Canada
|
| Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 7:08 am Post subject: Re: 39, 239 |
|
|
| Mike S wrote: | I'm having trouble spotting the <39> pair
and the <239> XY Wing. Can someone
point me in the right direction.
Thanks for your help. |
----------------------------------------
This is where I got with the basics:
[code]
+----------------+---------+------------+
| 236 1 7 | 9 8 23 | 4 5 23 |
| 23589 289 258 | 4 6 7 | 1 28 2389 |
| 2389 2489 248 | 5 1 23 | 39 7 6 |
+----------------+---------+------------+
| 28 3 248 | 1 24 5 | 6 9 7 |
| 7 24 6 | 3 24 9 | 8 1 5 |
| 1 5 9 | 8 7 6 | 2 3 4 |
+----------------+---------+------------+
| 4 29 1 | 7 5 8 | 39 6 239 |
| 5689 689 58 | 2 3 1 | 7 4 89 |
| 28 7 3 | 6 9 4 | 5 28 1 |
+----------------+---------+------------+
The xyz was 29 239 and 23 and that solved it for me. I spot these easier |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wendy W
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 144
|
| Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep, I still use paper and pencil (and eraser). I spend most of the day on the computer so it's a nice break to sit on the sofa.
Re: yesterday's puzzle -- I didn't need any advanced techniques either -- it just fell apart with those pairs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
George Woods
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 304
Location: Dorset UK
|
| Posted: Sat May 16, 2009 9:23 pm Post subject: an ER soluion alos works |
|
|
| If you take the Mike S grid. there is an ER in 2 in in box7 with a strong link in 2 s in col 7 so r2c2 cannot be 2 --- and hence a solution |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
