| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| keith 
 
 
 Joined: 19 Sep 2005
 Posts: 3355
 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:22 pm    Post subject: Super Hard Menneske |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I enjoyed this one. 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | Puzzle: M5307230sh(19) +-------+-------+-------+
 | . 6 . | . 4 . | 3 . 8 |
 | . . 2 | . 6 . | . . 7 |
 | . . . | 3 . 2 | . 6 . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . . 8 | 2 . 6 | 7 . . |
 | 2 4 . | . . . | . 1 5 |
 | . . 7 | 4 . 5 | 8 . . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | 5 . . | 1 . 3 | . . . |
 | . . 6 | . 5 . | 2 . . |
 | 7 2 . | . 8 . | . 5 . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | 
 
 Keith
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| arkietech 
 
 
 Joined: 31 Jul 2008
 Posts: 1834
 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:49 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I like it!  	  | Code: |  	  | *-----------------------------------------------------------* | 19    6     159   | 57    4     17    | 3     2     8     |
 | 34    13    2     | 58    6     18    | 1459  49    7     |
 | 8     7     145   | 3     9     2     | 145   6     14    |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 19    5     8     | 2     13    6     | 7     349   49    |
 | 2     4     3     | 89    7     89    | 6     1     5     |
 | 6     19    7     | 4     13    5     | 8     39    2     |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 5     8     49    | 1     2     3     | 49    7     6     |
 | 34    139   6     | 79    5     479   | 2     8     149   |
 | 7     2     149   | 6     8     49    | 149   5     3     |
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 (4=3)r2c1-(3=1)r2c2-(1)r8c2=(1)r8c9-(1=4)r3c9
 => r2c78,r3c3<>4
 singles
 
 | 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| tlanglet 
 
 
 Joined: 17 Oct 2007
 Posts: 2468
 Location: Northern California Foothills
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:13 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I had three moves, all on 1. 
 Flightless xy-wing -149 with vertex in r2c8 and a pincer transport,
 skyscraper 1 in r8c29,
 another flightless xy-wing -145 with vertex in r3c3 and pincer transport.
 
 +++++++++++
 
 Dan, very nice move.......
 
 Ted
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| daj95376 
 
 
 Joined: 23 Aug 2008
 Posts: 3854
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 5:16 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Code: |  	  | After 3x 2-String Kite {1,4,9}: 
 (*) c37r9 Skyscraper in <1> (four  cells)  =>  r1c3=1 or r3c7=1
 (5) r1c3 - r3c3 = r3c7      (three cells)  =>  no cell for <1>
 thus, r1c3<>5
 +-----------------------------------------------------+
 |  9    6   *15a  |  57   4    17   |  3    2    8    |
 |  34   13   2    |  58   6    18   |  59   49   7    |
 |  8    7    45b  |  3    9    2    | *145c 6    14   |
 |-----------------+-----------------+-----------------|
 |  1    5    8    |  2    3    6    |  7    49   49   |
 |  2    4    3    |  89   7    89   |  6    1    5    |
 |  6    9    7    |  4    1    5    |  8    3    2    |
 |-----------------+-----------------+-----------------|
 |  5    8    49   |  1    2    3    |  49   7    6    |
 |  34   13   6    |  79   5    479  |  2    8    149  |
 |  7    2   *149  |  6    8    49   | *149  5    3    |
 +-----------------------------------------------------+
 # 31 eliminations remain
 
 As a two-digit discontinuous loop:
 
 (1=5)r1c3 - r3c3 = (5-1)r3c7 = r9c7 - r9c3 = (1)r1c3  =>  r1c3=1
 
 | 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| arkietech 
 
 
 Joined: 31 Jul 2008
 Posts: 1834
 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:46 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | daj95376 wrote: |  	  | (5) r1c3 - r3c3 = r3c7      (three cells)  =>  no cell for <1> 
 | 
 NICE!
  |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| keith 
 
 
 Joined: 19 Sep 2005
 Posts: 3355
 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:04 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Danny, 
 In your grid there is an XY-wing 59-58-89.  Extending the 59 pincer by grouped coloring to R8C9 eliminates 9 in R8C4.
 
 (Which is how I originally solved it.)
 
 Keith
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| daj95376 
 
 
 Joined: 23 Aug 2008
 Posts: 3854
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 12:53 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | keith wrote: |  	  | Danny, 
 In your grid there is an XY-wing 59-58-89.  Extending the 59 pincer by grouped coloring to R8C9 eliminates 9 in R8C4.
 
 (Which is how I originally solved it.)
 
 | 
 Hello Keith,
 
 I normally check the puzzles posted in this group, but I try to only post unusual solutions that catch my eye ... or answer questions that may be raised. That way, I'm hoping not to interfere with the well-earned solutions like you and others post.
 
 Regards, Danny
 
 FWIW: There's a <15> gM-Wing present in the first four cells of my chain.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| strmckr 
 
 
 Joined: 18 Aug 2009
 Posts: 66
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 6:17 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| i did singles a box line reduction and naked pair 
 bringing it to here:
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | .--------------.-------------.----------------. | 19  6    159 | 57  4   17  | 3     2    8   |
 | 34@ 13@  2   | 58  6   18  |-1459 -49   7   |
 | 8   7   -145 | 3   9   2   | 145   6    14@ |
 :--------------+-------------+----------------:
 | 19  5    8   | 2   13  6   | 7     349  49  |
 | 2   4    3   | 89  7   89  | 6     1    5   |
 | 6   19   7   | 4   13  5   | 8     39   2   |
 :--------------+-------------+----------------:
 | 5   8    49  | 1   2   3   | 49    7    6   |
 | 34  139@ 6   | 79  5   479 | 2     8    149@|
 | 7   2    149 | 6   8   49  | 149   5    3   |
 '--------------'-------------'----------------'
 | 
 
 
 then used a hybrid wing. (better viewed as aic)
 
 AIC 4- r2c1 -3- r2c2 -1- r8c2 =1= r8c9 -1- r3c9 -4 => r2c78,r3c3<>4
 
 and its all singles from here out..
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| storm_norm 
 
 
 Joined: 18 Oct 2007
 Posts: 1741
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:52 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | strmckr wrote: |  	  | i did singles a box line reduction and naked pair 
 bringing it to here:
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | .--------------.-------------.----------------. | 19  6    159 | 57  4   17  | 3     2    8   |
 | 34@ 13@  2   | 58  6   18  |-1459 -49   7   |
 | 8   7   -145 | 3   9   2   | 145   6    14@ |
 :--------------+-------------+----------------:
 | 19  5    8   | 2   13  6   | 7     349  49  |
 | 2   4    3   | 89  7   89  | 6     1    5   |
 | 6   19   7   | 4   13  5   | 8     39   2   |
 :--------------+-------------+----------------:
 | 5   8    49  | 1   2   3   | 49    7    6   |
 | 34  139@ 6   | 79  5   479 | 2     8    149@|
 | 7   2    149 | 6   8   49  | 149   5    3   |
 '--------------'-------------'----------------'
 | 
 
 
 then used a hybrid wing. (better viewed as aic)
 
 AIC 4- r2c1 -3- r2c2 -1- r8c2 =1= r8c9 -1- r3c9 -4 => r2c78,r3c3<>4
 
 and its all singles from here out..
 | 
 
 interesting...
 I was calling this a mixed w-wing.
 
 strong link on 1's in row 8 join the (14) cell in r3c9 and the (13) cell in r2c2,
 much like how a w-wing joins two bi-value cells, except obviously these cells aren't identical. so you would need one more link to provide the pincer 4 in this case.
 
 (4=3)r2c1 - (3=1)r2c2 - (1)r8c2 = (1)r8c9 - (1=4)r3c9
 
 so the part in red would be the "hybrid" w-wing
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| strmckr 
 
 
 Joined: 18 Aug 2009
 Posts: 66
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:59 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| i was using udosuk's examples of a hybrid wing. im not 100% sure  what to call it if anything.
 it  kinda fits, but?   (...type 6 fits better...)
 
 its a funky move that works pretty good  either way
  |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |