dailysudoku.com Forum Index dailysudoku.com
Discussion of Daily Sudoku puzzles
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Nice and unique

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    dailysudoku.com Forum Index -> Other puzzles
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ravel



Joined: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 536

PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 2:31 pm    Post subject: Nice and unique Reply with quote

Code:
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . . 1 | . . . | 2 . . |
 | . 3 4 | . . . | 5 1 . |
 | 6 5 . | . . . | . 3 7 |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . . . | 8 . 3 | . . . |
 | . . . | 9 4 5 | . . . |
 | . . . | 2 . 1 | . . . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | 1 4 . | . . . | . 7 5 |
 | . 6 5 | . . . | 3 4 . |
 | . . 9 | . . . | 8 . . |
 +-------+-------+-------+ TTHsieh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marty R.



Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 5770
Location: Rochester, NY, USA

PostPosted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very interesting puzzle. I suspect there were more uniqueness eliminations available than I was able to come up with. But I did use a Type 4 UR, an XY-Wing and a Type 1 UR. Then I turned to my Medusa crutch and a couple of wraps finished it off.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keith



Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Two UR's and an XY-wing get me to here:
Code:
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 789   78    1     | 35    35    4679  | 2     689   4689  |
| 789   3     4     | 67    29    2679  | 5     1     689   |
| 6     5     2     | 14    189   489   | 49    3     7     |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 45    129   67#   | 8     67#   3     | 149   259   249   |
| 28    128   67#   | 9     4     5     | 167#  268   3     |
| 45    89    3     | 2     67#   1     | 4679# 5689  4689  |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 1     4     8     | 36    239   269   | 69    7     5     |
| 27    6     5     | 17    189   789   | 3     4     129   |
| 3     27    9     | 14567 15    467   | 8     26    126   |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+


Guess what? A Unique Swordfish! Marked #.

The only way to avoid the DP in C7 is that R7C7 is <6>. Puzzle solved!

(In C7, there is no other place for a <7> than in the cells marked #. To avoid the DP, the cells marked # cannot be <6>. The only other place for a <6> is R7C7.)

Keith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nataraj



Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 1048
Location: near Vienna, Austria

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Basics and an xy-wing (27-78-82 pivot r1c2) get one here.

This being a ravel exercise in uniqueness, at this point I did not use one of the xy-chains available

I: pincers '67' in r2c4 and '69' in r7c7 linked via r8c4, r3c4, r3c7; => r7c4=3, and the variant
II:pincers '17' in r8c4 and '27' in r9c2 linked via r3c4,r3c7,r7c7,r9c8; removes 7 from r8c1,r9c4,r9c6

But instead I hope to continue my UR education.

Code:

+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 789     78      1        | 35      35      46789    | 2       689     4689     |
| 2789    3       4        | 67      289     26789    | 5       1       689      |
| 6       5       28       | 14      1289    2489     | 49      3       7        |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 45      129     267      | 8       67      3        | 14679   2569    2469     |
| 238     128     23678    | 9       4       5        | 167     268     2368     |
| 45      89      3678     | 2       67      1        | 4679    5689    34689    |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 1       4       38       | 36      2389    2689     | 69      7       5        |
| 278     6       5        | 17      189     789      | 3       4       129      |
| 237     27      9        | 134567  135     467      | 8       26      126      |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+


The URs I see (could someone pls confirm or correct the reasoning and typecasting):

A Type 4 - {3,5} r19c45. Since r9c45 are strongly linked in 5, 3 cannot be in either of those 2 cells, therefore r9c1=3, right?

A Type 3 - {6,7} in r46c35. One of r46c3 must be {2,3,8}, together with {2,8} and {3,8} in r37c3 we have a virtual naked triple and r5c3 becomes {6,7} (remove 2,3,8 from r5c3). Right?

Those 2 steps take me to keith's position with the USf (unique swordfish), eventually. I'd just like to make sure I got the reasoning right.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
ravel



Joined: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 536

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, i did not notice the type 3, because the 3 in r9c1 leads to a type 1 there.

Another point of view, which (in this case) leads to the same elimination is, that in the 2 boxes (4 and 5) 6 or 7 must be outside the UR to destroy the deadly pattern. Only in r5c3 there is a 6 and a 7, thus it must be 6 or 7 and 238 can be eliminated.
The same argument here is valid for the two columns 4 and 6.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nataraj



Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 1048
Location: near Vienna, Austria

PostPosted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nataraj wrote:
pls confirm or correct the reasoning and typecasting

ravel wrote:
Wow, i did not notice the type 3, because ...

I take that as a confirmation Smile. And "wow" ... real flattering Very Happy! Thanks, ravel !

I do have another question, though:

I think I understand your argument "Another point ... eliminated" - makes perfect sense to me. But ...
ravel wrote:
The same argument here is valid for the two columns 4 and 6.


my questions:
- what is the DP there? I guess 67 in r29c46
- But what is the reasoning and the elimination to be made from there?

Thx for your patience!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    dailysudoku.com Forum Index -> Other puzzles All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group