dailysudoku.com Forum Index dailysudoku.com
Discussion of Daily Sudoku puzzles
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

How difficult is this puzzle?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    dailysudoku.com Forum Index -> Other puzzles
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
keith



Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA

PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:43 pm    Post subject: How difficult is this puzzle? Reply with quote

Code:
Puzzle: M5361273sh(67)
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 8 | . 4 . | . . . |
| . . . | . 1 . | . . 3 |
| 7 . 9 | . . . | 4 . 1 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 2 | . . 5 | . 9 . |
| . . . | 1 . 6 | . 8 . |
| 4 . 6 | 7 . . | . 1 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 5 . 1 | . . . | . 4 . |
| . . 4 | 9 . . | . . 2 |
| . . . | . 8 . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+

Should be relatively tough, if you look at the Menneske rating of 67.

So far as I can see, Menneske rates as "super hard" any puzzle that cannot be solved by a list of methods. So far as I can see this list does not include XY-wings and XYZ-wings. (Now, I realize why I like these puzzles so much. His list includes X-wings, swordfish, etc., so the fishes do not show up in the "super hard" category. They are "very hard".)

(Good news for Marty, too. He is an avid fisherman, except when it comes to Sudoku.)

Then, it seems, he starts testing to see how many of the remaining candidates need to be eliminated to solve the puzzle. IMHO, this is a fool's game: How can you judge the difficulty of a puzzle that you cannot solve? Particularly, if you are trying to rank its difficulty vs. other unsolved puzzles.

This puzzle: As my teachers used to say, it is easy, had you been paying attention. Quite simply, it can be cracked by a simple method Menneske does not use.

(By the way, knowing techniques that the puzzle makers do not test for is an "advantage", in that you can solve puzzles they rate as very difficult.)

Keith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ravel



Joined: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 536

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe the most complex thing, i was concerned with sudoku is rating. If you want to know, how hard a puzzle is, i have to ask you, which techniques you know and in which order you try to apply them, before i can answer. And also this is roughly speaking. It happened to me, that i saw a hidden quad before a naked single.

I think, a good way is to say, this puzzle can be solved with this pool of techniques (what you have on this site).
As far as i know, there is no program available, that has w-wings, special UR eliminations and other techniques implemented, that can be spotted relatively easy. But i also like that, otherwise each user could get a better solution than mine just with a click Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Victor



Joined: 29 Sep 2005
Posts: 207
Location: NI

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, much like Storm_norm's puzzle of a day or two ago - solved by colouring alone. Still nice. One of the reasons why I quite like Menneske's is the mild unpredictability in difficuly level.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keith



Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA

PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Victor,

This one is easily solved by a remote pair. (Which is coloring of a sort.)

Keith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Asellus



Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 865
Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 2:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It can also be solved by the probably even more basic Skyscraper (on <5> in r38), which is also a form of coloring.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
storm_norm



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1741

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hmm, all this discussion on techniques is begging for a poll.

maybe someone wants to start a thread...something along the lines of:

which techniques you prefer to apply first.

maybe a poll that will allow the user to give values to the techniques according to preference. for example:

I look for these techniques in this order

1. coloring ( includes skyscraper, kite, etc )
2. x-wings
3. xy-wings
4. URs
5. xy-chains
6. swordfish
7. xyz-wings
8. finned x-wings
9. APE
10. medusa

tally the polls to find a score on each technique. obviously, the lower the average is the higher on the list it is, and therefore is prefered more as a starting approach.

or maybe this is a little far fetched, lol.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    dailysudoku.com Forum Index -> Other puzzles All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group