| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		storm_norm
 
 
  Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:24 am    Post subject: mm 1309, 2/8/09 Diabolical | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . 9 5 | . . . | 4 1 . |
 
| . . 1 | . . . | . 7 9 |
 
| . . . | . 5 . | . . . |
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . . . | 3 . 2 | . 4 . |
 
| 6 . . | . 8 . | . . 5 |
 
| . 2 . | 1 . 5 | 3 . . |
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . . . | . 9 . | . . . |
 
| 8 3 . | . . . | 2 . . |
 
| . 4 7 | . . . | . 6 . |
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
 | 	  
 
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:12 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				One-Trick Pony.
 
 
 	  | Lots of Extraneous Steps wrote: | 	 		  gM-Wing: (5=9)r8c8 - (9)r9c7 = (9-5)r9c1 = (5)r9c4 => [r8c4]<>5
 
 | 	 
 
  Last edited by daj95376 on Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:55 am; edited 1 time in total | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		storm_norm
 
 
  Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:21 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Quote: | 	 		  | Lots of Extraneous Steps wrote | 	  
 
ROFL
 
 
funny. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 5:21 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Quote: | 	 		  | M-Wing: (5=9)r8c8 - (9)r9c7 = (9-5)r9c1 = (5)r9c4 => [r8c4]<>5  | 	  
 
 
Danny,
 
 
Here's my position after basics. How do you get rid of the 1 in r9c1 to do the M-Wing?
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 
| 23   9    5   | 678  23  678  | 4     1  68   |
 
| 23   68   1   | 268  234 3468 | 5     7  9    |
 
| 47   678  468 | 9    5   1    | 68    3  2    |
 
+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 
| 1579 1578 89  | 3    67  2    | 16789 4  1678 |
 
| 6    17   3   | 4    8   9    | 17    2  5    |
 
| 479  2    489 | 1    67  5    | 3     89 678  |
 
+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 
| 15   156  2   | 5678 9   34   | 178   58 34   |
 
| 8    3    69  | 567  14  467  | 2     59 147  |
 
| 159  4    7   | 258  123 38   | 189   6  138  |
 
+---------------+---------------+---------------+
 
 | 	  
 
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site[/quote] | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 7:15 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Marty R. wrote: | 	 		   	  | Quote: | 	 		  | M-Wing: (5=9)r8c8 - (9)r9c7 = (9-5)r9c1 = (5)r9c4 => [r8c4]<>5  | 	  
 
Here's my position after basics. How do you get rid of the 1 in r9c1 to do the M-Wing?
 
 | 	  
 
Here's my gM-Wing from another perspective -- a forcing chain. The <1> in [r9c1] never figures into the logic.
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  [r8c8]= 5                                                => [r8c4]<>5
 
 
[r8c8]<>5 [r8c8]=9 [r9c7]<>9 [r9c1]=9 [r9c1]<>5 [r9c4]=5 => [r8c4]<>5
 
 | 	 
 
  Last edited by daj95376 on Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:56 am; edited 1 time in total | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:27 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| OK, fair enough. But may I ask where the M-Wing terminology comes into play? | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:01 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Marty R. wrote: | 	 		  | OK, fair enough. But may I ask where the M-Wing terminology comes into play? | 	  
 
Ahhhhh    
 
 
I've been working with gM-Wing for so long that I didn't catch my mistake in calling it an M-Wing.
 
 
In the generalized case, cell [r9c1] only needs to contain <59> ... and does not have to be a bivalue cell.
 
 
See Keith's reference to Nataraj and Asellus in this link. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |