| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		George Woods
 
 
  Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 304 Location: Dorset UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 10:37 pm    Post subject: May 30 VH | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Did anyone else solve this by 2 W wings in direct sequence?
 
 
I recognize that my solution may well be a transposition of some other technique such as colouring 7s. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Marty R.
 
 
  Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 4:55 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I did it with multi-coloring on 7 followed by a W-Wing, which is not to say that there wasn't a W-Wing available at first that I missed. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		nataraj
 
 
  Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 5:37 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Here's what I did:
 
After basics...
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
 
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ 
 
| 49      2       3        | 8       49      57       | 57      1       6        | 
 
| 47      6       5        | 1       3       2        | 8       9       47       | 
 
| 1       789     48       | 457     4569    567      | 2       457     3        | 
 
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ 
 
| 259     589     6        | 359     1       4        | 39      578     257      | 
 
| 3       589     7        | 59      2       58       | 4       6       1        | 
 
| 2459    1       48       | 6       7       358      | 39      58      25       | 
 
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ 
 
| 8       57      2        | 3457    456     3567     | 1       457     9        | 
 
| 57      4       9        | 2       58      1        | 6       3       578      | 
 
| 6       3       1        | 457     458     9        | 57      2       4578     | 
 
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ 
 
 | 	  
 
play online
 
 
X-wing on 7 (rows 2 and 8, removes 7 from r49c9). This solves many cells. 
 
 
Then here:
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  
 
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ 
 
| 49      2       3        | 8       49      57       | 57      1       6        | 
 
| 47      6       5        | 1       3       2        | 8       9       47       | 
 
| 1       79      8        | 457     4569    567      | 2       45      3        | 
 
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ 
 
| 259     8       6        | 359     1       4        | 39      7       25       | 
 
| 3       59      7        | 59      2       8        | 4       6       1        | 
 
| 259     1       4        | 6       7       35       | 39      8       25       | 
 
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ 
 
| 8       57      2        | 3457    456     3567     | 1       45      9        | 
 
| 57      4       9        | 2       58      1        | 6       3       78       | 
 
| 6       3       1        | 457     458     9        | 57      2       48       | 
 
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ 
 
 | 	  
 
play online
 
 
...UR 25 r46c19 (in order to avoid the deadly pattern, r46c1 must contain 9) solves r1c1=4 and r5c2=9. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		George Woods
 
 
  Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 304 Location: Dorset UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 6:26 am    Post subject: The Double w wing solution | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Taking the first grid provided by Nataraj :-
 
 
57s in boxes 7,9 operating on row 8 deny a 5 to r7c8 which becomes 47
 
47s in boxes 3,9 operating on col 7 deny 4 to r3c8 so r2c9 is 4 ..... and
 
it falls out thereafter!
  Last edited by George Woods on Fri May 30, 2008 4:46 pm; edited 1 time in total | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Johan
 
 
  Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 206 Location: Bornem  Belgium
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 7:30 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				The 25 UR* in R46C19 pins <7> in R2C1, all three solutions for avoiding the possible 25 DP ends up with <7> in R2C1, which succumbs the puzzle.
 
 
#1 R46C1=9 => R1C1=4 => R2C1=7
 
 
#2 R6C1=4 => R2C1=7
 
 
#3 R4C9=7 => R2C9=4 => R2C1=7
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  +-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+
 
| 49        2         3   | 8         49       57   | 57        1       6     |
 
| 4=7       6         5   | 1         3        2    | 8         9       47    |
 
| 1         789       48  | 457       4569     567  | 2         457     3     |
 
+-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+
 
|*25+9      589       6   | 359       1        4    | 39        578    *25+7  |
 
| 3         589       7   | 59        2        58   | 4         6       1     |
 
|*25+49     1         48  | 6         7        358  | 39        58     *25    |
 
+-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+
 
| 8         57        2   | 3457      456      3567 | 1         457     9     |
 
| 57        4         9   | 2         58       1    | 6         3       578   |
 
| 6         3         1   | 457       458      9    | 57        2       4578  |
 
+-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------+ | 	 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		tlanglet
 
 
  Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 12:44 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				My route was a little longer, and more basic but interesting. After the initial x-wing on <7> to eliminate r49c9, I noticed two finned x-wings on <7> in r37c24 and r37c26. Then I realized that these two "interlocked" finned x-wings were part of a "jellyfish" in r1379c2467 that deleted r9c9 (as did the initial x-wing). The two finned x-wings destroyed each other but I removed the <7> for both: r7c6 and r3c4.
 
 
After significant clean-up, I still had to remove the <4> at r7c5 based on coloring to complete the puzzle.
 
 
This was the first "jellyfish" that I have actually found!
 
 
Ted | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		cgordon
 
 
  Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 769 Location: ontario, canada
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 1:16 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				That UR Johan mentioned is a TYPE 4.  Since there are only two 2's in C1 we can remove the 5's from C1 Box4. I know this because I am an expert in Type 4 URs  (since last Tuesday).
 
 
Though it seems I still had to use an x-wing in R28 to remove a <7> and set up the UR. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Earl
 
 
  Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 677 Location: Victoria, KS
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 2:17 pm    Post subject: May 30 VH | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				After the x-wing of 7's, there is an xy-wing (578) in boxes 8&9 which solves the puzzle.  There is also an xyz-wing (457) in boxes 2&3, but it does not finish the puzzle.
 
 
Earl | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		tlanglet
 
 
  Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 3:08 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | cgordon wrote: | 	 		  That UR Johan mentioned is a TYPE 4.  Since there are only two 2's in C1 we can remove the 5's from C1 Box4. I know this because I am an expert in Type 4 URs  (since last Tuesday).
 
 
Though it seems I still had to use an x-wing in R28 to remove a <7> and set up the UR. | 	  
 
 
In this case, the <5>s inr46c1 are removed by the <7> in r2c1 which makes r8c1=5.  
 
 
However I understood that a Type 4 UR required the other two cells to be bivalues. In this case, cell r4c9 contains a extra digit so that in fact the solution could have a <5> in either r46c1.
 
 
Did I overlook  something?    
 
 
Ted
 
 
Edit: Yes, I did overlook something! The comment by Craig was obviously appropriate after the x-wing removed the <7> inr4c9. (I don't like Friday either.)
  Last edited by tlanglet on Fri May 30, 2008 8:12 pm; edited 1 time in total | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		stevieboy
 
 
  Joined: 25 Jan 2008 Posts: 31 Location: Michigan
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 4:00 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | nataraj wrote: | 	 		   
 
...UR 25 r46c19 (in order to avoid the deadly pattern, r46c1 must contain 9) solves r1c1=4 and r5c2=9. | 	  
 
 
That's what did it for me, too! | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		Florida Bob
 
 
  Joined: 25 Jul 2007 Posts: 12
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 4:01 pm    Post subject: First x- wing | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| It must be Friday however, I can't see the x-wing that eliminates the 7's in rows 4 & 9 col. 9. Could someone be more specific. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		stevieboy
 
 
  Joined: 25 Jan 2008 Posts: 31 Location: Michigan
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 4:34 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				No problem, Florida Bob, 
 
 
The '7's in Rows 2 and 8, as well as along Column 1 are strong pairs (one or the other cell along those paths HAS to be a '7').
 
 
Therefore, in Column 9, the 7 HAS to be in either, in Row 2 or Row 8 - ONE OR THE OTHER.
 
 
So, any '7' along the rectangular path mentioned above, CAN NOT contain a '7'.
 
 
Take it easy! | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		andras
 
 
  Joined: 31 Oct 2007 Posts: 56 Location: Mid Wales
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 5:58 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				It certainly took a little time, but was fun in the end.
 
 
Perhaps we need a new category beyone 'VH' for these puzzzles that need multiple advanced techniques. Can I suggest Death By Sudoku?     
 
 
John | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		storm_norm
 
 
  Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 7:39 pm    Post subject: Re: First x- wing | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Florida Bob wrote: | 	 		  | It must be Friday however, I can't see the x-wing that eliminates the 7's in rows 4 & 9 col. 9. Could someone be more specific. | 	  
 
 
 
 
 
the above image shows the 7's in rows 2 and 8.  sudoku tells us that a 7 must occupy one of those rows.  so regardless which column we put a 7 in, a 7 must go in the other one, ( either col 1 or 9 )  therefore any other 7's in col 1 or 9 can be eliminated.
 
 
george woods, 
 
 
I like the double w-wing approach... I find these easier to find than xy-wings. | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		storm_norm
 
 
  Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 7:48 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | andras wrote: | 	 		  It certainly took a little time, but was fun in the end.
 
 
Perhaps we need a new category beyone 'VH' for these puzzzles that need multiple advanced techniques. Can I suggest Death By Sudoku?     
 
 
John | 	  
 
 
do you venture into the "other puzzles" category? | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		andras
 
 
  Joined: 31 Oct 2007 Posts: 56 Location: Mid Wales
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 8:41 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | storm_norm wrote: | 	 		   	  | andras wrote: | 	 		  It certainly took a little time, but was fun in the end.
 
 
Perhaps we need a new category beyone 'VH' for these puzzzles that need multiple advanced techniques. Can I suggest Death By Sudoku?     
 
 
John | 	  
 
 
do you venture into the "other puzzles" category? | 	  
 
 
I don't dare - I have a life to lead as well as doing Sudoku and crosswords!     
 
 
John | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		nataraj
 
 
  Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 10:03 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | andras wrote: | 	 		  
 
 
I don't dare - I have a life to lead as well as doing Sudoku and crosswords!     
 
 | 	  
 
 
But that is only the OTHER life !
 
 
      | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |