| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:11 pm    Post subject: A Vanhegan vh | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Code: | 	 		  Puzzle: VH4-1044182vh2.1.1.1
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . . 9 | 1 . . | 5 7 . | 
 
| . . . | . . 2 | . . 3 | 
 
| . . . | . . 5 | 6 4 . | 
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . . . | 5 8 . | . 3 . | 
 
| 1 3 . | 6 . 4 | . 5 8 | 
 
| . 5 . | . 2 9 | . . . | 
 
+-------+-------+-------+
 
| . 1 6 | 8 . . | . . . | 
 
| 4 . . | 2 . . | . . . | 
 
| . 8 5 | . . 3 | 4 . . | 
 
+-------+-------+-------+ | 	  Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		arkietech
 
 
  Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:47 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Code: | 	 		   *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 
 | 36    4     9     | 1     36    8     | 5     7     2     |
 
 | 5    *67    17    | 4    *69    2     | 18    18-9  3     |
 
 | 38    2     18    | 7     3-9   5     | 6     4    x19    |
 
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 
 | 679   679   47    | 5     8     1     | 2     3     467   |
 
 | 1     3     2     | 6     7     4     | 9     5     8     |
 
 | 678   5     478   | 3     2     9     | 17    16    1467  |
 
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 
 | 29    1     6     | 8     4     7     | 3     29    5     |
 
 | 4    *79    3     | 2     5     6     | 178   189  x179   |
 
 | 27    8     5     | 9     1     3     | 4     26    67    |
 
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 
xy-wing extended
 
(9=6)r2c5-(6=7)r2c2-(7=9)r8c2-(9)r8c9=(9)r3c9 => r2c8,r3c5<>9
 
 
Later a bug+1 finishes it. | 	 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:59 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				After basics: 	  | Code: | 	 		  +----------------+----------------+----------------+
 
| 36   4    9    | 1    36   8    | 5    7    2    | 
 
| 5   b67   17   | 4   a69   2    | 18  18-9  3    | 
 
| 38   2    18   | 7    39   5    | 6    4    19   | 
 
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
 
| 679 c679  47   | 5    8    1    | 2    3    467  | 
 
| 1    3    2    | 6    7    4    | 9    5    8    | 
 
| 678  5    478  | 3    2    9    | 17   16   1467 | 
 
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
 
|e29   1    6    | 8    4    7    | 3   f29   5    | 
 
| 4   d79   3    | 2    5    6    | 178  189  179  | 
 
| 27   8    5    | 9    1    3    | 4    26   67   | 
 
+----------------+----------------+----------------+ | 	  The 18 UR makes a 27 pseudo-cell in B9, which takes out 7 in R8C9, but that didn't take me very far.
 
 
M-wing:  6 in a forces 6 in c.  ad are pincers on 9.  With transport def, R2C8 <>9.  That leads to a BUG+1, which can also be solved by an XY-wing or a skyscraper on 7.
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 4:24 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Playing with a network solution from my solver lead to:
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		   If r6c1=67 then ...
 
 
 (6=7)r6c1 - (7=2)r9c1 - (2=6)r9c8  =>  r6c8<>6
 
 
 <47> UR r46c39 ...
 
 
 (6)r46c9                                         - (6)r6c8
 
 (1)r 6c9  - r3c9 = (1-8)r3c3 = r3c1 - (8=67)r6c1 - (6)r6c8
 
 (8)r 6c3                            - (8=67)r6c1 - (6)r6c8
 
 +--------------------------------------------------------------+
 
 |  36    4     9     |  1     36    8     |  5     7     2     |
 
 |  5     67    17    |  4     69    2     |  18    189   3     |
 
 |  38    2     18    |  7     39    5     |  6     4     19    |
 
 |--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
 
 |  679   679  *47    |  5     8     1     |  2     3     47+6  |
 
 |  1     3     2     |  6     7     4     |  9     5     8     |
 
 |  678   5    *47+8  |  3     2     9     |  17    1-6   47+16 |
 
 |--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
 
 |  29    1     6     |  8     4     7     |  3     29    5     |
 
 |  4     79    3     |  2     5     6     |  178   189   179   |
 
 |  27    8     5     |  9     1     3     |  4     26    67    |
 
 +--------------------------------------------------------------+
 
 # 40 eliminations remain
 
 | 	 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		keith
 
 
  Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:35 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Danny,
 
 
I noticed that, but thought it was kind of obvious ...
 
 
NOT!
 
 
Nice find!  My kind of move.
 
 
Keith | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		daj95376
 
 
  Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:01 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | keith wrote: | 	 		  I noticed that, but thought it was kind of obvious ...
 
 
NOT!
 
 
Nice find!  My kind of move.
 
 | 	  
 
Keith,   Thanks!
 
 
I had a difficult time taking the (simple) network contradiction found by my solver and unwinding it into something interesting.
 
 
 	  | Code: | 	 		  solver:  6r6c8  2r9c8  7r9c1  8r6c1  8r3c3  1r3c9  [r46c39]=UR47
 
 | 	  
 
I was able to unwind the logic to r6c1, but it took awhile to realize that I could treat the logic from there as a separate entity. Once I'd prepared the final results, I had to share it.
 
 
Regards, Danny | 
			 
		  | 
	
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	
	
		  | 
	
	
		 |