| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| keith 
 
 
 Joined: 19 Sep 2005
 Posts: 3355
 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:39 pm    Post subject: Free Press March 23, 2012 |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Multi-step? 
 Keith
 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | Puzzle: FP032312 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . 3 . | . . . | . 6 . |
 | 4 . 6 | . 3 . | 8 . 2 |
 | . . 2 | 1 . . | . 5 . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | 8 . . | . . 3 | . . . |
 | . . 3 | 8 . 2 | 5 . . |
 | . . . | 7 . . | . . 9 |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . 9 . | . . 1 | 6 . . |
 | 3 . . | . 2 . | 7 . . |
 | . 1 . | . . . | . 9 . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 
 | 
 Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
 
 Keith
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| arkietech 
 
 
 Joined: 31 Jul 2008
 Posts: 1834
 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:03 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I love those "hot wings" 
  	  | Code: |  	  | *-----------------------------------------------------------* | 159   3     1589  | 2     458   458   | 49    6     7     |
 | 4     5-7   6     | 59    3     579   | 8     1     2     |
 |a79    8-7   2     | 1     4678  4678  | 49    5     3     |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 8    d4567 c579   | 56    569   3     | 1     2     46    |
 |b19    46    3     | 8     19    2     | 5     7     46    |
 | 156   2     15    | 7     1456  456   | 3     8     9     |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 2     9     578   | 4     578   1     | 6     3     58    |
 | 3     568   58    | 569   2     5689  | 7     4     1     |
 | 567   1     4     | 3     5678  5678  | 2     9     58    |
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 m-wing
 (7=9)r3c1-r5c1=(9-7)r4c3=(7)r4c2 => r23c2<>7
 stte
 
 | 
 
 Edit: oops oop again
  i'm good tonight! 
 but not hot.
 Play/print online
 
 Last edited by arkietech on Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:05 am; edited 4 times in total
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| SudoQ 
 
 
 Joined: 02 Aug 2011
 Posts: 127
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:34 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | arkietech wrote: |  	  | I love those "hot wings" 
  	  | Code: |  	  | *-----------------------------------------------------------* | 159   3     1589  | 2     458   458   | 49    6     7     |
 | 4     5-7   6     | 59    3     579   | 8     1     2     |
 |a79    8-7   2     | 1     4678  4678  | 49    5     3     |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 8    d4567 c579   | 56    569   3     | 1     2     46    |
 |b19    46    3     | 8     19    2     | 5     7     46    |
 | 156   2     15    | 7     1456  456   | 3     8     9     |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 2     9     578   | 4     578   1     | 6     3     58    |
 | 3     568   58    | 569   2     5689  | 7     4     1     |
 | 567   1     4     | 3     5678  5678  | 2     9     58    |
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 h-wing
 (7=9)r3c1-r5c1=(9-7)r3c3=(7) => r23c2<>7
 stte
 
 | 
 | 
 Your grid doesn't seem to match your string.
 
 /SudoQ
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:55 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I wouldn't know a hot wing from a chicken wing. 
 Type 1 UR (46); r4c2<>46. After cleanup leaves us here:
 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | +-------------+--------------+---------+
 | 159 3  1589 | 2  458  458  | 49 6 7  |
 | 4   57 6    | 59 3    579  | 8  1 2  |
 | 79  78 2    | 1  4678 4678 | 49 5 3  |
 +-------------+--------------+---------+
 | 8   57 579  | 56 569  3    | 1  2 4  |
 | 19  4  3    | 8  19   2    | 5  7 6  |
 | 6   2  15   | 7  145  45   | 3  8 9  |
 +-------------+--------------+---------+
 | 2   9  578  | 4  578  1    | 6  3 58 |
 | 3   6  58   | 59 2    589  | 7  4 1  |
 | 57  1  4    | 3  5678 5678 | 2  9 58 |
 +-------------+--------------+---------+
 
 | 
 Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
 
 In the Type 3 UR (59) in boxes 28, either a 7 in r2c6 or 8 in r8c6 kills the DP. The 8 proves a 7 in r3c1; r2c2, r3c56<>7.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| daj95376 
 
 
 Joined: 23 Aug 2008
 Posts: 3854
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:41 pm    Post subject: Re: Free Press March 23, 2012 |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| My solver used a potpourri of steps, and still ended up using an XY-Chain to finish off the puzzle. As I see it, using a single-step chain from the beginning saves a lot of headache. ( 4x M-Wing, 4x S-Wing, and 4x L2-Wing are available. )
 
 
 BTW: Dan's "h-wing" is an M-Wing that goes through r4c3 (not r3c3).
 
 Note: Every H-Wing starts and ends in the same unit ... and r3c1 & r4c2 are not in the same unit.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| arkietech 
 
 
 Joined: 31 Jul 2008
 Posts: 1834
 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:26 am    Post subject: Re: Free Press March 23, 2012 |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | daj95376 wrote: |  	  | BTW: Dan's "h-wing" is an M-Wing that goes through r4c3 (not r3c3). 
 Note: Every H-Wing starts and ends in the same unit ... and r3c1 & r4c2 are not in the same unit.
 | 
 
 I'm going to keep working till I understand wings
   
 Sorry for the boo boos. Let me know if it is still wrong.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| keith 
 
 
 Joined: 19 Sep 2005
 Posts: 3355
 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:02 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Sudoku Susser: 
 1 x Simple Forcing Chains
 1 x Fishy Cycles
 3 x XY-Wing
 2 x Unique Rectangles and Loops
 4 x Intersection Removal
 1 x Simple Naked Sets
 18 x Pinned Squares
 
 (Not in order.  The fishy cycle can be seen as a skyscraper.)
 
 Keith
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| tlanglet 
 
 
 Joined: 17 Oct 2007
 Posts: 2468
 Location: Northern California Foothills
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:21 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Another solution is my old friend, the "almost naked pair". 
 anp(56=9)r4c45-r5c5=r5c1-(9=7)r3c1-(7=*58)r23c2-(58=6)r8c2-r8c4=(6)r4c4; r4c2<>5*, r4c29,r6c56<>6
 
 Ted
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:19 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Marty R. wrote: |  	  | I wouldn't know a hot wing from a chicken wing. 
 Type 1 UR (46); r4c2<>46. After cleanup leaves us here:
 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | +-------------+--------------+---------+
 | 159 3  1589 | 2  458  458  | 49 6 7  |
 | 4   57 6    | 59 3    579  | 8  1 2  |
 | 79  78 2    | 1  4678 4678 | 49 5 3  |
 +-------------+--------------+---------+
 | 8   57 579  | 56 569  3    | 1  2 4  |
 | 19  4  3    | 8  19   2    | 5  7 6  |
 | 6   2  15   | 7  145  45   | 3  8 9  |
 +-------------+--------------+---------+
 | 2   9  578  | 4  578  1    | 6  3 58 |
 | 3   6  58   | 59 2    589  | 7  4 1  |
 | 57  1  4    | 3  5678 5678 | 2  9 58 |
 +-------------+--------------+---------+
 
 | 
 Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
 
 In the Type 3 UR (59) in boxes 28, either a 7 in r2c6 or 8 in r8c6 kills the DP. The 8 proves a 7 in r3c1; r2c2, r3c56<>7.
 | 
 
 Please note, as you might already have, that my grid is in error, although it doesn't change my UR solution. The grid failed to consider the locked 8s in box 7 and the 59 pair in c4. Sorry.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| arkietech 
 
 
 Joined: 31 Jul 2008
 Posts: 1834
 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:09 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | tlanglet wrote: |  	  | Another solution is my old friend, the "almost naked pair". 
 anp(56=9)r4c45-r5c5=r5c1-(9=7)r3c1-(7=*58)r23c2-(58=6)r8c2-r8c4=(6)r4c4; r4c2<>5*, r4c29,r6c56<>6
 
 Ted
 | 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | *-----------------------------------------------------------* | 159   3     1589  | 2     458   458   | 49    6     7     |
 | 4    e57    6     | 59    3     579   | 8     1     2     |
 |d79   e78    2     | 1     4678  4678  | 49    5     3     |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 8     4567  579   |a56   a569   3     | 1     2     46    |
 |c19    46    3     | 8    b19    2     | 5     7     46    |
 | 156   2     15    | 7     1456  456   | 3     8     9     |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 2     9     578   | 4     578   1     | 6     3     58    |
 | 3    f568   58    |g569   2     5689  | 7     4     1     |
 | 567   1     4     | 3     5678  5678  | 2     9     58    |
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 anp(56=9)r4c45-r5c5=r5c1-(9=7)r3c1-(7=*58)r23c2-(58=6)r8c2-r8c4=(6)r4c4; r4c2<>5*, r4c29,r6c56<>6
 
 if a=56 r6c56,r4c29>56
 if a4c5=9 r4c4=6, r4c2<>5 r6c56,r4c29<>6 => r6c56,r4c29<>6, r4c2<>5
 
 | 
 I like it! Got to learn how to spot them.
 
 Play/print online
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| keith 
 
 
 Joined: 19 Sep 2005
 Posts: 3355
 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 5:33 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Marty R. wrote: |  	  |  	  | Code: |  	  | +-------------+--------------+---------+
 | 159 3  1589 | 2  458  458  | 49 6 7  |
 | 4   57 6    | 59 3    579  | 8  1 2  |
 | 79  78 2    | 1  4678 4678 | 49 5 3  |
 +-------------+--------------+---------+
 | 8   57 579  | 56 569  3    | 1  2 4  |
 | 19  4  3    | 8  19   2    | 5  7 6  |
 | 6   2  15   | 7  145  45   | 3  8 9  |
 +-------------+--------------+---------+
 | 2   9  578  | 4  578  1    | 6  3 58 |
 | 3   6  58   | 59 2    589  | 7  4 1  |
 | 57  1  4    | 3  5678 5678 | 2  9 58 |
 +-------------+--------------+---------+
 | 
 In the Type 3 UR (59) in boxes 28, either a 7 in r2c6 or 8 in r8c6 kills the DP. The 8 proves a 7 in r3c1; r2c2, r3c56<>7.
 | 
 How?
 
 Keith
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| JC Van Hay 
 
 
 Joined: 13 Jun 2010
 Posts: 494
 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:48 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Marty's Type 3 UR(59)B28 step in Eureka! notation ...   
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | +-----------------+--------------------+-----------+ | 159   3    159  | 2     458   458    | 49  6  7  |
 | 4     5-7  6    | (59)  3     (795)  | 8   1  2  |
 | (79)  8    2    | 1     46-7  46-7   | 49  5  3  |
 +-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 | 8     57   579  | 6     59    3      | 1   2  4  |
 | (19)  4    3    | 8     19    2      | 5   7  6  |
 | 6     2    (15) | 7     145   45     | 3   8  9  |
 +-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 | 2     9    578  | 4     578   1      | 6   3  58 |
 | 3     6    (58) | (59)  2     (895)  | 7   4  1  |
 | 57    1    4    | 3     5678  5678   | 2   9  58 |
 +-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 
 7r2c6=[DP(59)r28c46=8r8c6]-(8=5)r8c3-(5=1)r6c3-(1=9)r5c1-(9=7)r3c1 => -7r2c2.r3c56
 | 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| keith 
 
 
 Joined: 19 Sep 2005
 Posts: 3355
 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:58 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | JC Van Hay wrote: |  	  | Marty's Type 3 UR(59)B28 step in Eureka! notation ...   
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | +-----------------+--------------------+-----------+ | 159   3    159  | 2     458   458    | 49  6  7  |
 | 4     5-7  6    | (59)  3     (795)  | 8   1  2  |
 | (79)  8    2    | 1     46-7  46-7   | 49  5  3  |
 +-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 | 8     57   579  | 6     59    3      | 1   2  4  |
 | (19)  4    3    | 8     19    2      | 5   7  6  |
 | 6     2    (15) | 7     145   45     | 3   8  9  |
 +-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 | 2     9    578  | 4     578   1      | 6   3  58 |
 | 3     6    (58) | (59)  2     (895)  | 7   4  1  |
 | 57    1    4    | 3     5678  5678   | 2   9  58 |
 +-----------------+--------------------+-----------+
 
 7r2c6=[DP(59)r28c46=8r8c6]-(8=5)r8c3-(5=1)r6c3-(1=9)r5c1-(9=7)r3c1 => -7r2c2.r3c56
 | 
 | 
 Thanks.  If you go through R9C1, you conclude R3C1=9.
 
 Keith
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| JC Van Hay 
 
 
 Joined: 13 Jun 2010
 Posts: 494
 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:21 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | keith wrote: |  	  | If you go through R9C1, you conclude R3C1=9. | 
 Ok, this means r8c3<>5 and the DP is unneeded
   
 Marty's step may be advantageously replaced by the XY Chain :
 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | +----------------+----------------+-----------+ | 159   3   159  | 2   458   458  | 49  6  7  |
 | 4     57  6    | 59  3     579  | 8   1  2  |
 | (79)  8   2    | 1   467   467  | 49  5  3  |
 +----------------+----------------+-----------+
 | 8     57  579  | 6   59    3    | 1   2  4  |
 | (19)  4   3    | 8   19    2    | 5   7  6  |
 | 6     2   (15) | 7   145   45   | 3   8  9  |
 +----------------+----------------+-----------+
 | 2     9   78-5 | 4   578   1    | 6   3  58 |
 | 3     6   8-5  | 59  2     589  | 7   4  1  |
 | (57)  1   4    | 3   5678  5678 | 2   9  58 |
 +----------------+----------------+-----------+
 
 (5=1)r6c3-(1=9)r5c1-(9=7)r3c1-(7=5)r9c1 => -5r78c3; stte
 | 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Marty R. 
 
 
 Joined: 12 Feb 2006
 Posts: 5770
 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 9:02 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | +-------------+-----------------+---------+ |  159 3   1589 | 2  458   458  | 49 6 7  |
 |  4   57  6    | 59 3     579  | 8  1 2  |
 | E79  78  2    | 1  4678  4678 | 49 5 3  |
 +-------------+-----------------+---------+
 |  8   57  579  | 56 569   3    | 1  2 4  |
 | D19  4   3    | 8  19    2    | 5  7 6  |
 |  6   2  C15   | 7  145   45   | 3  8 9  |
 +-------------+-----------------+---------+
 |  2   9   578  | 4  578   1    | 6  3 58 |
 |  3   6  B58   | 59 2    A589  | 7  4 1  |
 |  57  1   4    | 3  5678  5678 | 2  9 58 |
 +-------------+-----------------+---------+
 | 
 
 By the way, if I may ask a question that has theoretical, but no practical, value: when doing something like this can r28c6 be considered a 78 pseudo cell?
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| keith 
 
 
 Joined: 19 Sep 2005
 Posts: 3355
 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:32 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Marty R. wrote: |  	  | 
 
  	  | Code: |  	  | +-------------+-----------------+---------+ |  159 3   1589 | 2  458   458  | 49 6 7  |
 |  4  *57  6    | 59 3     579  | 8  1 2  |
 | E79  78  2    | 1  4678  4678 | 49 5 3  |
 +-------------+-----------------+---------+
 |  8   57  579  | 56 569   3    | 1  2 4  |
 | D19  4   3    | 8  19    2    | 5  7 6  |
 |  6   2  C15   | 7  145   45   | 3  8 9  |
 +-------------+-----------------+---------+
 |  2   9   578  | 4  578   1    | 6  3 58 |
 |  3   6 *B58   | 59 2    A589  | 7  4 1  |
 |  57  1   4    | 3  5678  5678 | 2  9 58 |
 +-------------+-----------------+---------+
 | 
 
 By the way, if I may ask a question that has theoretical, but no practical, value: when doing something like this can r28c6 be considered a 78 pseudo cell?
 | 
 Yes, and it's not theoretical.  the cells * are an XY-wing with the pseudocell, pincers on 5.
 
 Keith
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |